Accounting Solutions: Build, Buy, or Embed?

A cost-based decisioning framework for SaaS and fintech leaders 

If you're a software platform that handles money, chances are you'll eventually face a common question: how do we help users account for their money movement?

The answer will define your next chapter. It affects everything from your engineering spend to your launch timeline to how much control you retain over the user experience.

Most teams explore three routes: build their own accounting features, buy an integration, or embed accounting APIs that deliver accounting behind the scenes. Each has its merits, but the real differences emerge in engineering load, compliance exposure, and long-term cost.

In this guide, we’ll break down a five-dimensional framework for evaluating your options for moving forward. You’ll learn how costs compound, where complexity creeps in, and why more product teams are embedding accounting to scale efficiently while keeping full ownership of the experience.

Why Accounting Infrastructure Is More Complex Than It Appears

Building accounting functionality looks straightforward on paper—but, in practice, it means replicating decades of financial and regulatory logic.

Behind every transaction sits an intricate web of dependencies, including ledgers, reconciliation rules, audit trails, and compliance frameworks that vary by region and reporting standard.

The real challenge isn’t the initial build. It’s the upkeep.

• Compliance evolves constantly, with new regulations introducing risk and rework.
• Integrations multiply, with every new payment flow or financial product increasing the complexity of your ledger.
• Bugs carry higher stakes, with errors in accounting systems not just breaking features—but breaking trust.

For product teams, maintaining accounting logic becomes a long-term tax on engineering bandwidth. That’s why the build, buy, or embed decision has become one of the most strategic architectural choices for modern SaaS platforms.

The Three Paths to Accounting Capabilities: Build, Buy, or Embed

Once the need for accounting functionality becomes clear, product leaders typically weigh three approaches. All can deliver results—but the differences in ownership and long-term cost are significant.

At the core, it’s a question of where accounting takes place and who controls the experience.

• Buying outsources the experience to a third-party platform.
• Building keeps everything in-house but requires significant resources.
• Embedding allows teams to deliver accounting capabilities directly within their product, supplied and powered by an external infrastructure provider.

Let’s break these approaches down one by one.

1. Build: Total Control, Total Cost

Building means developing accounting capabilities from the ground up. You own the stack—everything from ledgering to reconciliation to reporting—and shoulder the full cost of compliance and maintenance.

Advantages

• Full control over UX, data flow, and roadmap
• Deep integration across your product

Trade-offs

• Long, expensive development cycles
• High ongoing maintenance and regulatory overhead
• Significant opportunity costs for engineering and product teams

For platforms whose passion is building accounting products, building may be justified. For everyone else, it diverts substantial focus and resources from product innovation.

2. Buy: Fast, But Fragmented

Opting for an accounting integration means connecting your platform to an existing accounting tool, such as QuickBooks or Xero. That means users authenticate and manage their books elsewhere—while you maintain the underlying integration layer.

In this model, your product acts as a connector, rather than the destination. Instead of completing their financial workflows in your interface, users are redirected to another platform to record transactions, reconcile accounts, or pull reports—fracturing the experience and reducing engagement with your product.

Advantages

• Lower engineering investment
• Maintain focus on core product and workflows

Trade-offs

• Users leave your product to complete their accounting tasks
• Limited control over UX, data, and roadmap
• Ongoing work to maintain API syncs and handle external changes

When you utilize a third-party integration, your users must leave to get what they need—and the costs can add up on their end, too. Accounting expenses can total up to 20% of a small business's revenue, and adding another subscription on top of yours only increases that burden. That means users pay for your platform and the accounting tool—while also building loyalty to someone else's brand.

3. Embed: Your Brand, Their Infrastructure

Embedded accounting bridges the gap. It gives you the control of building plus the efficiency of integrating.

You partner with an API-first provider—like Tight—that delivers accounting logic, compliance, and reporting infrastructure behind the scenes. Your users stay in your product, interacting with your interface and your brand, while Tight handles the heavy lifting for you.

Advantages

• Seamless, in-app experiences tailored to your brand
• Fast to launch and easy to maintain
• Built-in compliance and scalability

Trade-offs

• Requires initial engineering setup to integrate APIs

The demand for this approach is clear: 79% of small businesses say they'd be more likely to choose a software provider that includes all accounting functions directly into their application. More than just a back-office feature, embedding makes accounting a lever for revenue, retention, and roadmap differentiation.

‍

In short:

Build: You do everything.
Buy: They do the accounting, you own the integration.
Embed: You own the experience, while the provider runs the engine behind the scenes.

Why This Distinction Matters

Building, buying, or embedding will all help you establish accounting functionality—but total cost and operational overhead differ dramatically over time.

The next section introduces a five-dimensional framework for quantifying those costs and identifying which model best aligns with your team’s priorities.

The Five Cost Dimensions Framework

The true cost of accounting infrastructure extends beyond just development hours and licensing fees. It also includes the time, risk, and focus your team takes on to make the system work day to day.

This framework outlines five core cost dimensions to help product leaders clearly evaluate their options:

1. Upfront Engineering Cost
2. Maintenance and Ongoing Upkeep
3. Compliance and Risk Management
4. Speed to Market
5. Product and Team Focus

Each dimension contributes to your platform’s total cost of ownership (TCO)—and each reveals where building, buying, and embedding diverge most sharply.

1. Upfront Engineering Cost

The upfront engineering cost covers the initial build: the time, resources, and expertise required to launch your new accounting functionality.

• Build requires full-stack development—including ledgers, data models, UI, and compliance logic—before a single customer can use the feature.
• Buy reduces engineering lift but adds a layer of integration complexity.
• Embed minimizes both, delivering pre-built accounting logic through APIs that plug directly into your product.

Ultimately, embedding allows teams to deliver accounting functionality in weeks, not quarters, while retaining full UX control.

2. Maintenance and Ongoing Upkeep

Every accounting feature has a long tail. After launch, teams must maintain reconciliation logic, handle API updates, monitor uptime, and respond to compliance changes.

• Build creates a permanent maintenance requirement. Tax rules and edge case developments become your team’s problem.
• Buy offloads some maintenance to the vendor but introduces new dependencies and integration testing overhead.
• Embed centralizes maintenance under the provider, freeing your engineers to focus on product roadmap priorities.

That means embedded infrastructure keeps maintenance levels predictable—and your provider handles the updates instead of your sprint cycles.

3. Compliance and Risk Management

Beyond recording data, a successful accounting system enforces trust. But maintaining compliance across multiple jurisdictions is complex and ongoing.

• Build means developing, testing, and maintaining every compliance safeguard internally yourself.
• Buy leverages a compliant third party, but that trust stops at their system’s boundary lines.
• Embed incorporates compliance into your own product’s workflow through an infrastructure partner that maintains continuously audited systems and up-to-date regulatory coverage.

With embedded compliance, your product operates from a position of strength—consistently reliable, audit-ready, and prepared to grow with your business.

4. Speed to Market

Of course, how quickly you launch determines how quickly you can capture value.

• Build requires the longest timeline, often spanning six to twelve months before the accounting feature actually goes live.
• Buy offers immediate availability but often compromises user experience and brand continuity to get there fast.
• Embed delivers enterprise-grade functionality within weeks and is fully integrated into your platform’s UX.

That means embedded accounting solutions can collapse time-to-market without compromising user experience or brand ownership.

5. Product and Team Focus

Engineering bandwidth is finite. The more time your team spends managing accounting infrastructure, the less time they have to innovate on your core product.

• Build diverts your team’s focus toward maintaining systems outside your strategic differentiation.
• Buy creates dependency management overhead that can slow iteration cycles.
• Embed lets teams stay focused on product innovation, while a specialized provider manages all of the infrastructure behind the scenes.

The bottom line here? The right embedded partner extends your capabilities without stretching your team.

Why This Framework Matters

Most teams underestimate at least one of these dimensions when planning their roadmap. They may budget for engineering but not maintenance. They may plan for launch but not for compliance drift. Or they may assume buying will be simple until version mismatches and API updates require constant patching.

Evaluating these dimensions separately clarifies where the long-term costs really live—and why embedded accounting has become the default choice for product leaders who need to scale quickly without sacrificing control.

Scenario Math: How the Costs Add Up

Below, we lay out some directional scenarios that illustrate how these costs typically unfold in practice. They’re not hard numbers, but they reflect patterns seen across hundreds of software teams evaluating accounting infrastructure. 

Scenario 1: The Hidden Cost of Building In-House

At first, building in-house can seem straightforward: you allocate a few engineers for six months, develop the core accounting features, and ship. But, in reality, the costs compound quickly.

If you use three engineers for six months, you’re looking at 18 engineer-months before launch. Then, you might need to add one full-time developer post-launch for maintenance, compliance updates, and bug fixes.

Within a year, your “one-time” build has become an ongoing team.

Every new feature, jurisdiction, or API update increases that scope. The hidden cost expresses itself in lost momentum. Engineering cycles that could have gone toward new customer features are now spent maintaining a parallel product inside your platform.

The bottom line: Building costs more than it seems—and it never really ends.

Scenario 2: The Integration Tax of Buying

Buying an off-the-shelf integration can seem like the most efficient option. Setup is fast, and you don’t have to handle the core accounting logic. But, over time, the friction adds up.

Every time the external system changes its API, your team must rework data syncs, re-test workflows, and field support tickets from users encountering errors. Data mismatches become common, especially when accounting and operational data follow different update schedules.

Since the user experience now spans multiple products, every design or pricing change outside of your control can ripple through your own platform.

The bottom line: Paying for accounting integrations accelerates launch but creates long-term dependency. You save time up front and spend it later—in maintenance, customer support, and lost UX control.

Scenario 3: The Compounding Value of Embedding Accounting

Embedding accounting replaces one-time tradeoffs with long-term leverage. Implementation requires some engineering effort upfront, but products can go live in as little as two weeks. It’s an investment that quickly pays itself back in faster launches, lower maintenance, and reduced risk.

Pre-built accounting APIs don’t require extra engineers on your team—especially if those APIs already integrate with your existing tech stack. 

Instead, updates, reconciliation logic, and compliance changes are handled automatically by the provider. Your product and engineering teams can stay focused on building new features, not on maintenance.

As usage grows, the value compounds. Your team ships faster, users stay inside your product longer, and you avoid the expensive cycle of rebuilding or replacing accounting infrastructure down the line.

The bottom line: Embedding accounting lowers costs and unlocks velocity, shifting from a resource drain into a growth feature.

Why the Scenario Math Matters

Cost comparisons often overlook the shape of costs over time. 

• Building starts with a large spike that never fully declines.
• Buying appears flat but hides recurring integration overhead.
• Embedding smooths out both curves—shifting effort to a one-time integration and long-term scalability.

Understanding this pattern helps teams plan with confidence. It’s not just about the cost to launch—it’s also about the cost to sustain, adapt, and grow.

Future-Proofing Through Embedded Accounting

Accounting decisions don’t end at launch. What happens next—how your infrastructure evolves, how compliance changes, how your team allocates bandwidth—depends entirely on the path you choose.

Platforms that build carry the weight of maintenance and iteration for years. Platforms that buy manage dependencies and fragmentation. Platforms that embed gain durability, including the ability to scale, adapt, and innovate without rebuilding from scratch.

Continuous Compliance Without Ongoing Maintenance

Regulations, accounting standards, and API requirements don't stand still. For teams that build or buy, keeping pace is a full-time responsibility. Embedded infrastructure removes that burden.

Your provider maintains compliance coverage, audit readiness, and version updates across every customer and region. That means your team can expand into new markets, integrate additional financial products, or iterate on UX—without triggering a compliance overhaul each time.

Scalability Without Re-Architecture

As your product grows, the volume of accounting data increases along with the complexity of managing it. In a build or buy model, that growth often triggers new infrastructure investments: additional servers, new database models, or major integration rewrites.

Embedded solutions eliminate those scaling thresholds.

The provider's infrastructure absorbs increased demand while preserving system performance. For your users, the experience remains consistent. For your team, this means avoiding the costly re-architecture cycles that slow down innovation.

Ability to Focus on New Roadmap Priorities

The more infrastructure you manage internally, the less time your engineers have for roadmap priorities. Embedding shifts that equation. By outsourcing maintenance and compliance, your team regains bandwidth to focus on differentiation—features, partnerships, and experiences that drive customer growth.

This focus compounds over time. Teams that embed tend to ship faster, learn faster, and better allocate resources to high-impact initiatives rather than to overcoming technical debt.

Strategic Payoffs That Compound With Time

Over time, embedding reshapes the economics of product development. You invest once to integrate, then benefit continuously from improved uptime, performance, and compliance handled on your behalf.

Instead of diverting engineers to maintain accounting infrastructure, you build new value on top of it. That means you can expand your financial capabilities with the same APIs, data, and workflows that power your existing platform.

Long-Term Gains Start With Embedded Infrastructure

In the end, building promises control, but at a steep, ongoing cost. Buying offers speed, but at the expense of ownership. Embedding delivers both: it’s about your product, your brand, and your experience—but powered by proven accounting infrastructure that scales with you.

When viewed through the five cost dimensions—engineering, maintenance, compliance, speed, and focus—the tradeoffs become clear. Building drains resources over time. Buying introduces fragmentation and dependency. Embedding, by contrast, compounds in value. It saves time, preserves control, and future-proofs your platform against the complexities that come with growth.

For product and platform leaders, the decision is no longer whether to embed, but how to embed intelligently.

How Tight Can Help

Tight enables product and platform teams to integrate full accounting functionality directly into their applications through modular, API-first infrastructure. Our solution is built to scale with your users—ensuring reliability, compliance, and real-time performance across millions of transactions.

What Sets Tight Apart:

• Proven infrastructure trusted by leading SaaS platforms and fintechs
• Enterprise-grade compliance and audit controls built in by design
• Developer-first APIs for seamless integration and iteration
• Full white-labeling to maintain your brand’s experience from end to end

When you embed with Tight, you extend your product’s capabilities, improve retention, and unlock new revenue opportunities at every turn.

See Tight in Action

Discover how Tight’s embedded accounting APIs can power your platform’s next phase of growth.

Schedule a demo →